Mud: Condition, Conditioner, Conditioning…

Monday, May 4th, 2009

So I lied.

I have another poem which I wrote straight in to Word and haven’t touched it since. When I was at the Garden there was a brief conversation about how potatoes condition the soil so that it’s not too crumbly and not too sticky. Two things entered my mind. First, a reading by Julia Copus at this year’s Stanza Festival in Scotland. She talked about how ‘falling in love’ was an inaccurate phrase, since it implies that love is outside of us. Better to think of love as something involuntary that rises up through you. Second, I thought of some graffiti on the toilet wall in the English Faculty: ‘LOVE IS NOT A POTATO’ is written in sprawling letters and beneath it there’s some wise-crack response that I can’t remember. I was taken by the idea of conditioning – of love being something that makes you fertile ground for all the growths that accompany it – purpose, jealousy, satisfaction, self-worth, libido.

The etymology of the word as a verb isn’t so positive. It’s Old French, comingled with Spanish, and means ‘ to impose a condition on, to limit with conditions’. The first entry in the OED says:

To treat about conditions; to make conditions, make terms; to stipulate, bargain with.

And it’s not until definition 9a. that it says:

To bring to a desired state or condition; to make fit or in good condition.

My thesaurus throws up words like: treat, prepare, prime, temper, process, acclimatize, acclimate, season. The act of conditioning implies that there is someone for whom something else must reach an optimum state, so that something else might happen. How creepy to think of some weird, unknown aspect of yourself conditioning your body to give/receive love without your consent. We can’t choose who we fall in love with, is the old maxim. But we can choose the plants we grow. There was definitely a kind of adoration in the faces of the gardeners are they carted compost from the heap to the flower bed. It’s such straight forward, rich, black stuff.

There’s something about nothingness in there too which arose from a question I had and have yet to properly explore – does it exist in nature? (there are vacuums, but even they have to be contained by something else.) Is there some branch of science that can explain why we seem to think we came from nothing? If we get rid of nothing as a concept, isn’t it then easier to think about things being infinite? And so on.

I get a lot from potatoes. :)

And I thought I’d spare you the handwriting this time.

—–

Love is not a potato

I noticed, squatting, that someone had written
‘Love is not a potato’ on the toilet wall.

I remembered this weeks later when a gardener
Felt some soft, black, earth between her fingers

And said that potatoes were the key: potatoes kept
The earth crumbled and stuck, moist and clay,

To itself, falling from itself, moist and firm.
What else is love? If the bald, pocked potato

Saw the mysterious black earth across the room
And held her together – what else constitutes

The thing we all crave, need, want – love to have
And have to give. Love is the potato conditioning

The soil. It is the thing within the thing.

Silent mimicry. It lays in the earth
As we will lay in the earth one day,

Our bodies still and yielded to the gaseous mouths,
The putrid oils, the parting in to nothingness.

I wonder if nothingness exists. If there is such
A thing as no-thing. From where did we come?

We ask, as if the answer was not in the potato,
Ancient root sprung from ancient roots.

The point is that it sprung. There is no nothingness
On earth. Earth fills every space, as love does –

All sturdy stuff. All stuff that will outlast.
The potato curled in its dumb sleep,

The speechless girl struck dumb by the eerie
Beauty of earth crumbling between finger and thumb.

tagged under: .............

ABOUT THIS AUTHOR

London writer, based on allotment in Hampstead; gently led by gardener Scarlett Cannon and Mentee of Katherine Stanton.

  1. Russell Thompson
    May 5th, 2009

    Lovely poem, Jay – though I think I should refer you to the track “Stand Alone” on Apples & Snakes’s “twofive” album.

    Reply

    Jay Bernard Reply:

    Yes, I remember it. Hegley, Crisis and Beard?

    Why is the potato an object of comedy?

    In its defence, I will make this poem uber serious.

    Reply

    Russell Thompson Reply:

    I think vegetables and animals are fair game in comic poetry (and they turn up again and again) because they can’t get one up on you by being ironic back. ‘Otherwordly’ is currently funny, and potatoes do seem possessed of a sort of moon-faced innocence (it’s all those eyes) that is entirely their own. Discuss. Or perhaps don’t.

    Reply


  2. Charlie
    May 5th, 2009

    I agree that the phrase ‘falling in love’ is lame. I once read a Buddhist text that wrote instead of ’standing in love’. Conditioning is even more intriguing, and the notion of love stirring up something within you then refining it….. definitely:)
    The potato graffiti artist would be proud to know they inspired you… It’s far more creative as a symbol than a red rose. I once got given a mango on Valentines day, which I thought was so much better than flowers. I’m writing about an avocado at the moment, and my mentor Jo Bell has written a brilliant poem about vegetables, including a line about a lettuce variety called a ‘lazy blonde’. You’ve definitely started a trend…..

    Reply


  3. Marlow
    May 20th, 2009

    I’d like to defend the phrase ‘falling in love’. I don’t agree with Julia Copus. I don’t think the phrase inevitably implies falling into something ‘external’. I think you can fall into something within yourself. Especially when you’ve been living in that rational, somewhat external headspace of ordinary workaday life. I love the idea of falling out of that into someplace else.

    Ultimately, love is a collaboration between something in you AND something out there embodied in that other person.

    Reply

    Jay Bernard Reply:

    @Marlow: Hm. How does one ‘fall’ internally? I think I agree with your point about moving from the head-space of ordinary life in to something else, but I think I prefer the metaphor of conditioning because it properly embodies that idea and further suggests that love is internal – it’s an aspect of the self which grows and envelops our inner life. And no, love is not necessarily a collaboration between you and someone / something or else we would not talk about it being unrequited. Better I think to say it’s a condition, a mode of reception.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to receive regular updates on this blog
et_footer(); ?>