Making New Places
Monday, June 15th, 2009Michel de Certeau is a French Philosopher whose work has been very influential in theories about space and place. I studied two chapters of his book, The Practice of Everyday Life (Walking the City, and Spatial Stories) at University and I keep returning to his ideas today.
De Certeau makes a strong argument for a democratic view of space, and makes a link between city and text which I am particularly interested in. He writes: “… space is a practiced place. Thus the street geometrically defined by urban planning is transformed into a space by walkers. In the same way, an act of reading is the space produced by the practice of a particular place: a written text.”
I love this distinction between designed place and practiced space. It suits my politics to think about places as being made into spaces by the people who operate within them. And I like the connection with reader reception theories (something else I studied at University and a theory made very ‘real’ in Reader Development work) – this idea that the reader plays a creative role in the creation of a text.
There’s a wonderful bit in ‘Walking the City’, where de Certeau talks about how architects/planners etc. name new places, and how those names only have currency if they are used by the inhabitants. He talks about these names being “disposed in constellations” across the city “these words slowly lose, like worn out coins, the value engraved on them, but their ability to signify outlives its first definition […] these names make themselves available to the diverse meanings given them by passers-by.”
The writer bit of me sometimes feels a bit queasy at the thought of relinquishing so much control over the interpretation of my writing, but then I like this idea of a text being a place to be explored and created anew.
Which reminds me of a quote I read a couple of years ago by Alice Munro, which annoyingly I can’t lay my hands on right now. She talked about how she sees short stories as houses for a reader to explore. This was in the context of her rarely starting short stories at the beginning, but diving in half way through.
I suppose I’m saying, are we creating new places in our fiction? And what does that mean? And do we allow our readers the flexibility to explore them in whatever way they might choose?
tagged under: Alice Munro.Michel de Certeau.reader reception theory-
A Pint For The Ghost
A Place For Words
Aoife Mannix
Baroque in Hackney
Bernadine Evaristo
Book Trust: Writer in residence blog
bookfutures
Brrnrrd
Deconstructive Wasteland
Drew Gummerson
Gareth Durasow
Gists and Piths
Indexed
Karen McCarthy
Lemn Sissay
Likestarlings
Luke Wright
Mark Doty
Metrophobia
Michael Rosen
Molly Naylor
Niall O’Sullivan
Open Notebooks
Poetry Mosaic
Rose Cook
Secret Agent Artist
spacetmlab
Stella Duffy
The Crawshaw Blog
The Poet Laura-Eate
The Postmistress’s Blog
this is yogic
Tim Clare
Yemisi Blake
Zena Edwards
Listen
The Poetry ArchivePoetry in the Press
Producers
Adverse CamberApples & Snakes
Penned In The Margins
Promoters
Aldeburgh Poetry FestivalApples & Snakes
Behind The Mic
Book Slam
Cheltenham Poetry Festival
Hay Festival
Ledbury Poetry Festival
Litfest
Manchester Literature Festival
OneTaste
Penned In The Margins
Phrased & Confused
Writing on the Wall
Publishers
Bloodaxe BooksFlipped Eye Publishing
Inpress Books UK
Penned In The Margins
Salt Publishing
Tall Lighthouse
Resources
Article 19Arvon
BBC Poetry Season
Booktrust
British Council
English PEN
Index on Censorship
International Pen
Literature Training
Litfest
Metaroar
New Writing North
New Writing Partnership
New Writing South
Poetry Can
Poetry London
Poetry School
Poetry Translation Centre
The Book Cover Archive
The Literacy Consultancy
The Literature Network
The Poetry Archive
The Poetry Library
The Poetry Society
The Reading Agency
Website for Writers
Write for Your Life
Write Out Loud
Writing on the Wall
What's On?
MetaroarPoetry London
Write Out Loud









5 Comments
subscribe comments feedCharlie Jordan
June 16th, 2009
Interesting ideas and I love the idea of the place names being ‘disposed like constellations’ across the city.’ Also once you get to know a city the names the locals give to places irrespective of the official names. In b’ham we have a sculpture of a naked woman in a pool of water with a fountain – she’s been called the ‘Floozey in the jacuzzi’ by us all!
Also intrigued by your notion that we create new spaces with our writing, and I think at the same time we’re sharing our ‘inner world’ or spaces with the page and our readers.
x
Reply
Sarah Butler Reply:
June 17th, 2009 at 9:26 am
Hi Charlie
S
I love that idea about sharing inner spaces with the page and the reader. And I agree about the ‘insider’ knowledge of cities. When I lived in Leicester you knew if people were local by the way they pronounced ‘Belvoir’ Street (if you’re local, you say ‘Beaver St’!)
I love the idea that names for places only have currency if they are used – that if a council calls a street Sarah Street but everyone who lives there calls it Charlie Street, then it’s called Charlie St
Reply
Andy Darby
June 16th, 2009
Hi Sarah
Your quote from De Certeau is most interesting.
At first glance the spoken word is another presentation of written text, but actually it is a moment in time, to be present in and inhabit; you can’t revisit it in the same way.
So what act does the spoken word produce? Is the spoken word a practice of the text? Or a place in itself, and the practice listening?
Reply
Sarah Butler Reply:
June 17th, 2009 at 9:18 am
Hi Andy,
I wonder if every place is a moment in time, to be present in and inhabit. I wonder if we can ever really revisit places, because we’ve changed, there are different people there, the sky’s different etc. (and again, with a book, we are different people by the time we reread them?). This is making me think, though, about the ‘trend’ (?!) for putting filmed performances online – what does that do to/say about revisiting?
I agree though, that the spoken and written word are different. I don’t think I see spoken word – particularly work that’s been created to be read – as ‘just’ a practice of the text.
I’m afraid I can’t think of anything very coherent to say this morning(see that – not write! What are blogs doing to our idea of text and speech?), but I’m thinking – in a half-formed way – about how spoken word takes place in a specific and chosen place, whilst a book is sent out into the world and the reader chooses where to read it. Perhaps the environment/ place has less influence over the experience of reading a book than it does over the experience of listening to spoken word? (I’m having horrible flashbacks of poetry readings in cold, atmosphereless libraries…..)
S
Reply
Sarah Butler
June 17th, 2009
Hi Charlie
I love that idea about sharing inner spaces with the page and the reader. And I agree about the ‘insider’ knowledge of cities. When I lived in Leicester you knew if people were local by the way they pronounced ‘Belvoir’ Street (if you’re local, you say ‘Beaver St’!)
I love the idea that names for places only have currency if they are used – that if a council calls a street Sarah Street but everyone who lives there calls it Charlie Street, then it’s called Charlie St
S
Reply
Leave a Reply